Pros For Death Penalty Essay

Capital Punishment Essay - Benefits of the Death Penalty

  • :: 5 Works Cited
  • Length: 1419 words (4.1 double-spaced pages)
  • Rating: Excellent
Open Document

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - More ↓
Benefits of the Death Penalty


Have you ever thought about if the person next to you is a killer or a rapist? If he is, what would you want from the government if he had killed someone you know? He should receive the death penalty! Murderers and rapists should be punished for the crimes they have committed and should pay the price for their wrongdoing. Having the death penalty in our society is humane; it helps the overcrowding problem and gives relief to the families of the victims, who had to go through an event such as murder.

First, people should know the history of the death penalty. The death penalty has a long history dating back to the 16th Century BC. "In 16th Century BC Egypt, a death sentence was ordered for members of nobility, who were accused of magic. They were ordered to take their own life. The non-nobility was usually killed with an ax"(Burns). During the 18th Century BC, King Hammurabi of Babylon had a code that arranged the death penalty for 25 different crimes although murder was not one of them (Burns).


The death penalty has been around since the time of Jesus Christ. Executions have been recorded from the 1600s to present times. From about 1620, the executions by year increased in the US. It has been a steady increase up until the 1930s; later the death penalty dropped to zero in the 1970s and then again rose steadily. US citizens said that the death penalty was unconstitutional because it was believed that it was "cruel and unusual" punishment (Amnesty International). In the 1970s, the executions by year dropped between zero and one then started to rise again in the 1980s. In the year 2000, there were nearly one hundred executions in the US (News Batch). On June 29, 1972, the death penalty was suspended because the existing laws were no longer convincing. However, four years after this occurred, several cases came about in Georgia, Florida, and Texas where lawyers wanted the death penalty. This set new laws in these states and later the Supreme Court decided that the death penalty was constitutional under the Eighth Amendment (Amnesty International).

The very first legal executions came in the United States was during the Revolutionary War against Great Britain. British soldiers hung the first person to die by the death penalty, Nathan Hale, for espionage (Farrell).

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Capital Punishment Essay - Benefits of the Death Penalty." 123HelpMe.com. 13 Mar 2018
    <http://www.123HelpMe.com/view.asp?id=18710>.

LengthColor Rating 
Capital Punishment Essay - Benefits of the Death Penalty - Benefits of the Death Penalty Have you ever thought about if the person next to you is a killer or a rapist. If he is, what would you want from the government if he had killed someone you know. He should receive the death penalty. Murderers and rapists should be punished for the crimes they have committed and should pay the price for their wrongdoing. Having the death penalty in our society is humane; it helps the overcrowding problem and gives relief to the families of the victims, who had to go through an event such as murder....   [tags: Argumentative Persuasive Essays]
:: 5 Works Cited
1419 words
(4.1 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Capital Punishment in Michigan Essay - The majority of the United States uses the death penalty; should we add one more to the list and have Michigan become a state that uses the death penalty. Some people think that bringing the death penalty to Michigan would a good idea. Others think that doing this is stupid and would not be just and they should just go to jail. Michigan should bring the death penalty here because it would decrease crime rate, benefit Michigan overall, and criminals who just got released from prison for murder could not go and kill another innocent person....   [tags: Capital Punishment, Death Penalty]
:: 4 Works Cited
711 words
(2 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
Essay on The Benefits of Capital Punishment - The Benefits of Capital Punishment Justice is about enforcing consequences for one’s own actions to endorse personal responsibility and the notion of capital punishment does just that. Capital punishment is an effective and efficient method of deterring would be criminals and preventing criminals to commit more crimes. It is by far the oldest form of punishment in the world and remains in effect in many nations. Through discussing many arguments in support of capital punishment it is obvious why this method of punishment is so controversial and why it should remain in effect today, regardless of the negative criticism it garners....   [tags: Persuasive Justice System Death Penalty Essays]
:: 5 Works Cited
1038 words
(3 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Capital Punishment Must Be Put To Death Essay - Capital punishment, better known as the death penalty, has been around for centuries. Like all elements of modern society, the death penalty has evolved over the course of many years. Initially, the death penalty was administered by a royal court or monarchy through brutal stoning. Since then, the guillotine, noose, electric chair, and [currently] lethal injection have all been tools created to administer the death penalty here in the United States. Before the act of actually ending the criminal’s life is performed he or she waits on death row during the course of any court proceedings....   [tags: Capital Punishment, Death Penalty]
:: 5 Works Cited
1713 words
(4.9 pages)
Powerful Essays[preview]
The Ethics of Capital Punishment Essay - Americans have argued over the death penalty since the early days of our country. In the United States only 38 states have capital punishment statutes. As of year ended in 1999, in Texas, the state had executed 496 prisoners since 1930. The laws in the United States have change drastically in regards to capital punishment. An example of this would be the years from 1968 to 1977 due to the nearly 10 year moratorium. During those years, the Supreme Court ruled that capital punishment violated the Eight Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment....   [tags: Capital Punishment, Death Penalty]1503 words
(4.3 pages)
Powerful Essays[preview]
Essay about Economics of Crime: Capital Punishment - Introduction Capital punishment was an ancient penalty. This has incurred many argues since 18th century. The focal points are ‘value of life’ and ethical concerns. Besides, the economics analysis also is important, which focuses on the effects and efficiency of capital punishment. In the article, the anterior part indicates the supporting reasons of death penalty, the posterior part indicates the cons. Support Reason Deterrence of punishment Becker (1968), first of all, assumes that the crime is bad which incurs social loss, it should be deterred, death penalty is the severest punishment, and potential criminals are normal individuals....   [tags: Capital Punishment, Death Penalty]
:: 6 Works Cited
1843 words
(5.3 pages)
Term Papers[preview]
Capital Punishment Should Be Legalised Essay - Capital punishment is a controversial topic all around the world, and has been a prominent punishment in several centuries to deal with criminals committing the most heinous crimes. However, every year some of the most gruelling things in the world occur and are committed by people simply because they ‘can’ do it. Horrific things such as murder, rape and bombings are some of the many actions done every day, which devastates the lives of millions of families and friends all over the world. Some, if not all of these events can leave a person tremendously frightened, scared and extremely terrified....   [tags: Capital Punishment, Death Penalty]
:: 12 Works Cited
723 words
(2.1 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
The Ethics of Capital Punishment Essay - Should one person have the right to end another human's life. It is a question most people have the answer for when it comes to capital punishment. Capital punishment is known to some people one of the cruelest punishment to humanity. Some people believe giving a person the death penalty doe's not solve anything. While other's believe it is payback to the criminal for the crime they have committed. There have been 13,000 people executed since the colonial times, among 1900 and 1985 there were 139 innocent people sentence to death only 23 were executed....   [tags: Capital Punishment, Death Penalty]1610 words
(4.6 pages)
Powerful Essays[preview]
The Benefits of the Death Penalty Essay -   Fifty-nine criminals were put to death by means of the death penalty in 2004. Whether it had been by lethal injection, electrocution, gas chamber, hanging or even the firing squad was it the correct thing to do. This is a commonly asked question concerning this controversial topic. Should these criminals, murders, and rapists have be put to death. Is the death penalty a proper form of punishment. As Sellin stated, "Whenever hurt is done you shall give life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth..." (9)....   [tags: Cause Effect Capital Punishment]
:: 8 Works Cited
1105 words
(3.2 pages)
Good Essays[preview]
Essay about Benefits of the Death Penalty - Have you ever thought about if the person next to you is a killer or a rapist. If he is, what would you want from the government if he had killed someone you know. He should receive the death penalty. Murderers and rapists should be punished for the crimes they have committed and should pay the price for their wrongdoing. Having the death penalty in our society is humane; it helps the overcrowding problem and gives relief to the families of the victims, who had to go through an event such as murder....   [tags: Pro Capital Punishment Essays]1542 words
(4.4 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]

Related Searches

Death Penalty         Capital Punishment         Benefits         Death Sentence         Overcrowding Problem         16th Century         Amnesty International         Own Life        




The reason that I have included this history is to prove that if something has been working, why stop this from working.Some people say that sending the murderers to death row is inhumane because these people deserve a right to live. This is wrong because they have given up their right to live for the horrible and heinous crimes they committed.

There also has been the problem of overcrowding in prisons and jails. Some people say that this is a problem but having more jails built will solve this problem. Having more prisons or jails built may help solve the problem but the death penalty effectively stops draining more money from the taxpayers to house murderers. These murderers get three warm meals a day; they do nothing all day, and have a place to sleep just because the taxpayers fund these facilities. Murderers on death row do not deserve to get a place to stay. They deserve to get their life taken away from them because of the atrocious crimes that these criminals have done.

The people who are on death row come from all types of race. The national death row population is 3,525, split with 3,477 men and 48 women. The ethnicity is much more varied. There are 1,610 whites, 1,490 blacks, 344 Latinos, 39 Native Americans, 41 Asians and 1 unknown, since August 5, 2003 (death row statistics). The total executions since 1976 are 870, which seem to be a lot, but in all reality, it is a small number compared to the 3,525 inmates still on death row (Farrell). Regardless of their race, they should be killed if they committed murder. With the statistics above it proves that any race can be put on death row, so there should be no problem of putting them to death.

Several countries use the death penalty, including China, Iraq, Iran, U.S.A., and Saudi Arabia. In the United States, twelve of the states do not allow the death sentence. The twelve states are Michigan, Wisconsin, Maine, Minnesota, North Dakota, Hawaii, Alaska, Iowa, West Virginia, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont. These states say it is inhumane to kill someone but I believe if a murderer kills someone they should be killed as well. Less than one percent of murderers are sentenced to death, while only two percent of death row inmates are executed. The reason that this is relevant is because having this many people on death row drains the taxpayer's money. Today more than 75 inmates on death row have sat more than 20 years. If an inmate has been on death row for over 20 years then he deserves to die because that person is draining the taxpayer's money. In May of 2000, a recent study on the death penalty found that 65 percent of the US supports the death penalty (Farrell). With that amount of people supporting the death penalty, there should be no problem putting murderers to death because the majority likes the death penalty.

Many people say that the death penalty does not even help because there are not enough people being executed. One major way the death penalty helps is that it could relieve a family if someone is murdered and the convicted criminal is put to death. A perfect example was Timothy McVeigh when he was put to death in 2001, which was the first execution by the government since 1963 (CNN.com). The death penalty is good because the inmates who deserve to be killed, should be killed. This is a circular argument, which is a logical fallacy. A circular argument is when someone reaches a conclusion because it is true by not proven by facts, in other words the argument chases its own tail. I believe that if the people are just going in a circular argument then there is no way that, the people will gain ground to get rid of the death penalty.

In the year 2002, there were at least 1,526 people executed in 31 countries, and at least 3,248 people were sentenced to death in 67 countries. In addition, 81 percent of the executions took place in China, Iran, and the U.S.A. (Farrell). Those facts are just for 2002 and it seems that the number of people executed during this time was a large number. The death penalty is helping cut down the population of inmates on death row. There is no reason for them to believe that this is not helping. It seems that there is not a large number but if someone was to look at the statistics, it is actually a lot (Justice For All).Giving relief to friends and families for the murders on the their sibling or friend is done through the death penalty. The death penalty solves the overcrowding problem and this process is a humane action. Many people are losing their tax dollars to the government to pay for death row murderers, while these murderers should receive the death. These murderers do not deserve to live and have all of their expenses paid for committing those crimes. Now, why should anyone agree with not having the death penalty? They should not! The death penalty helps resolve many problems, such as the overcrowding problem. This process is humane and the persons that perform this task are not playing God. In the Bible, God has said that the people should uphold the law (Holy Bible). In the future, many problems could be resolved keeping the death penalty and not getting rid of it.

Works Cited

Amnesty International. "The Death Penalty." The Death Penalty. 22 Oct. 2003 http://web.amnesty.org/pages/deathpenalty_index_eng.
Burns, Kari Sable. "Death Penalty." KariSable.com. 27 Oct. 2003 http://www.karisable.com/crpundeath.htm.
CNN.com. "Timothy McVeigh Dead". 11 June 2001. 14 Nov. 2003 http://www.cnn.com/2001/LAW/06/11/mcveigh.01/index.html.
Death Penalty Information Center. "Death Penalty Info." Death Penalty Information Center. 21 Oct. 2003 http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/.
Death Penalty Information Center. "The History of the Death Penalty." Death Penalty Information Center. 21 Oct. 2003 http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?did=199&scid=15.
The Holy Bible
Farrell, Mike. "Death Penalty." Death Penalty Focus. 22 Oct. 2003 http://www.deathpenalty.org/facts/other/facts_statistics.shtml.
Justice For All. "Pro-Death Penalty." Pro-Death Penalty. 22 Oct. 2003 http://www.prodeathpenalty.com/Resources.htm.
News Batch. 15 Oct. 2003. 27 Oct. 2003 http://www.newsbatch.com/deathpenalty.htm.



DEATH PENALTY ARGUMENTS:

This Paper in Memoriam of Sean Burgado

My Precious Nephew - Murdered

June 7, 1969 to May 21, 1997

Ì

 

 DEATH PENALTY ARGUMENTS:

Deterrent  or  Revenge

(Pros and Cons)  

INTRODUCTION

 

          What is Capital punishment?  Capital punishment is the death penalty.  It is used today and was used in ancient times to punish a variety of offenses. Even the bible advocates death for murder and other crimes like kidnapping and witchcraft.  

            When the word death penalty is used,  it makes yelling and screaming from both sides of extremist.  One side may say deterrence, while the other side may say,  but you  may execute an innocent man. 

            Today, one of the most debated issues in the Criminal Justice System  is the issue of capital punishment or the death penalty.    Capital punishment was legal until 1972, when the Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional in Furman v. Georgia stating that it violated the Eight and Fourteen Amendments citing cruel and unusual punishment.  However, in 1976, the Supreme Court reversed itself with Gregg v. Georgia and reinstated the death penalty but not all states  have the death penalty. 

Thirteen states do not have the death penalty:  Alaska, District of Colombia, Hawaii, Iowa, Main, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.  

AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY (CONS)

Death Penalty Fails to Rehabilitate

            What would it accomplish to put someone on death row?  The victim is already dead-you cannot bring him back.  When the opponents feel “fear of death” will prevent one from committing murder, it is not true because most murders are done on the “heat of passion” when a person cannot think rationally.  Therefore, how can one even have time to think of  fear in the heat of passion (Internet)?

ACLU and Murderers Penniless

            The American Civil Liberty Union (ACLU) is working for a moratorium on executions and to put an end to state-sanctioned murder in the United States.  They claim it is very disturbing to anyone who values human life.

            In the article of the ACLU Evolution Watch,  the American Bar Association said the quality of the legal representation is substantial.  Ninety-nine percent of criminal defendants end up penniless by the time their case is up for appeal.  They claim they are treated unfairly.  Most murderers who do not have any money, receive the death penalty.  Those who live in counties pro-death penalty are more likely to receive the death penalty.  (Internet).

Death Penalty Failed as a Deterrent

Some criminologist claim they have statistically proven that when an execution is publicized, more murders occur in the day and weeks that follow.  A good example is in the Linberg kidnapping.  A number of  states adopted the death penalty for crime like this, but figures showed kidnapping increased.  Publicity may encourage crime instead of preventing it (McClellan, G., 1961).

            Death is one penalty which makes error irreversible and the chance of error is inescapable  when based on human judgment .  On the contrary, sometimes defendants insist on execution.  They feel it is an act of kindness to them.  The argument here is -  Is life imprisonment a crueler fate?”    Is there evidence supporting the usefulness of the death penalty securing the life of the citizens (McClellan, G. 1961)?

Does the death penalty give increased protection against being murdered?  This argument for continuation of the death penalty is most likely a deterrent, but  it has failed as a deterrent.  There is no clear evidence  because empirical studies  done in the 50’s by Professor Thorsten Sellin, (sociologist)  did not  give support  to deterrence (McClellan, G., 1961).

Does not Discourage Crime

            It is noted that we need extreme penalty as a deterrent to crime.  This could be a strong argument if it could be proved that the death penalty discourages murderers and kidnappers.  There is strong evidence that the death penalty does not discourage crime at all (McClellan, G., 1961).

Grant McClellan (1961) claims:

                        In 1958 the10 states that had the fewest murders –fewer

than two a year per 100,000 population -were New Hampshire

Iowa, Minnesota, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Wisconsin,

Rhode Island, Utah, North Dakota and Washington.  Four of

                       these 10 states had abolished the death penalty.

 

The 10 states, which had the most murderers from eight to

 fourteen killings per100,000 population were Nevada,

Alabama, Georgia, Arkansas, and Virginia - all of them

enforce the death penalty.  The fact is that fear of the

death penalty has never served to reduce the crime rate (p. 40).

Conviction of the Innocent Occurs

            The states that have the death penalty should be free of murder, but  those states have the most murders, and the states that abolished the death penalty has less.  Conviction of the innocent does occur and death makes a miscarriage of justice irrevocable.  Two states Maine and Rhode Island abolished the death penalty because of public shame and remorse after they discovered they executed  some innocent men.

 

Fear of Death Does not Reduce Crime. 

 

            The fear of the death penalty has never reduced crime.  Through most of history

executions were public and brutal.  Some criminals were even crushed to death slowly under heavy weight.  Crime was more common at that time than it is now.  Evidence shows execution does not act as a deterrent to capital punishment.

Motives for Death Penalty- Revenge

            According to Grant McClellan (1961), the motives for the death penalty may be for revenge.  Legal vengeance solidifies social solidarity against law breakers and is the alternative to the private revenge of those who feel harmed. 

FOR THE DEATH PENALTY (PROS)

Threat of Death Penalty Rate of Homicide Decreases

Frank Carrington (1978) states- is there any way one can tell whether the death penalty deters murders from killing?  There is no way one can tell whether the death penalty deters murderers from killing.  The argument goes on that proponents of capital punishments should not have to bear the burden of proving deterrence by a  reasonable doubt.  Nor should the abolitionist have to prove deterrence by a reasonable doubt -neither side would be able to anyway. 

            Frank Carrington (1978) claims common sense supports the inference that if, the threat of the death penalty decreases, the rate of murders increases than it may be true.  But  if the threat had increased, the homicide rate may decrease.   

            Justice Stewart held in the Supreme Court in Gregg v. Georgia:

Although some of the studies suggest that the death

penalty may not function as a significantly greater

                       deterrent than lesser penalties, there is no convincing

empirical evidence supporting or refuting this view.

                      

We may nevertheless assume safely there are murders,

            such as those who act in passion, for whom the threat of

           death has little or no deterrent effect.  But for many others,

           the death penalty undoubtedly,  is a significant deterrent.

 

There are carefully contemplated murders, such as murder

           for hire, where the possible penalty of death may well enter

           the cold calculus that precedes the decision to act

          ( as cited in Carrington, 1978. p. 87).

 

J.      Edgar Hoover, late director of  Federal Bureau of Investigations, asks the

following questions:  “Have you ever thought about how many criminals escape

punishment, and yet, the victims never have a chance to do that?  Are crime victims in the United States today the forgotten people of our time?  Do they receive full measure of justice (as cited in Isenberg, 1977, p. 129)?  

A criminal on death row has a chance to prepare his death, make a will,  and make his last statements, etc.  while some  victims can never do it.  There are many other crimes where people  are injured by stabbing, rape, theft, etc.   To some degree at least, the victims right to freedom and pursuit of happiness is violated.

            When the assailant is apprehended and charged, he has the power of the judicial process who protects his constitutional rights.  What about the victim?  The assailant may have compassion from investigating officers, families and friends.  Furthermore, the criminal may have organized campaigns of propaganda to build sympathy for him as if he is the one who has been sinned against.  These false claims are publicized, for no reason, hence, protecting the criminal (Isenberg, I., 1977).

            The former  Theodore L. Sendak, Attorney General of Indiana delivered a speech to Law enforcement officials in Northern Indiana on  May 12, 1971 (as cited in Isenberg, 1977):            

                        “Our system of criminal law is to minimize human

                         suffering by works or order primarily to forestall

                         violence or aggression. In the question of the death

                         penalty, we must ask ourselves which action will

                         serve the true humanitarian purpose of criminal law.

 We should weigh the death of the convicted murders

  against the loss of life of his victims and the possibility

  of potential victims to murder (p. 129)

In arguments of the death penalty, there are two lives to think about.  Too much emphasis is placed on the convicted murderer, the one being executed, and the victim is all forgotten. 

Crime Rate Increases

Millions are being killed and will be killed because our justice system is not working.  Millions have already been killed and will be killed every year.  According to Time Magazine, there are 2,000,000 people beaten in the United States.  Some are knifed, shot, or assaulted (Internet).   

Crime growth has been going up in the past because of  too much  leniency going hand in hand with the increased rate of  people being victimized.  There are many loop holes devised for offenders, and because of that  crime rate has increased drastically.  Between l960 to 1968 crime rate increased 11 times.  More and more people are being  murdered, raped, assaulted, kidnapped, and robbed, etc. (Isenberg, I., 1997).

Free Will

            When you commit a felony, it is  a matter of free will.  No one is compelled to commit armed robbery, murder, or rape.  The average citizen does not have a mind or intentions  to become a killer or being falsely accused of murder.  What he is worried about is being a victim.

Deterrent in 27 States

Opponents argue that there is no deterrent effect by using the death penalty.  According to Baily, who did a study from l967 to l968, the death penalty was a deterrent

in 27 states.  When there was a moratorium on Capital Punishment in the United States, the study showed murder rates increased by 100%.  The study also reviewed 14 nations who abolished the death penalty.   It (the study) claimed murder increased by 7% from five years before the abolition period to the five years after the abolition (Internet).

 Studies were made by Professor Isaac Erlich  between the period of 1933 and 1969.  He concluded  “An additional execution per year may have resulted in  fewer murders  (Bedau, 1982, p. 323)”. 

The number of years on the average spent in death row is 10 years.  It is known, with all the appeals, the death penalty is not swift!  In fact, most murderers feel they most likely will never be put to death.  If the death penalty was swift and inevitable, there certainly would be a decrease in homicide rates.  (Internet).

Death Feared

Most people have a natural fear of death- its a trait man have to think about what will happen before we act.  If we don’t think about it consciously, we will think about it unconsciously.  Think- if every murderer who killed someone died instantly, the homicide rate would be very low because no one likes to die.  We cannot do this, but if the Justice system can make it more swift and severe, we could change the laws to make capital punishment faster and make appeals a shorter process.  The death penalty is important because it could save the lives of thousands of potential victims who are at stake (Bedau, H., 1982).

In a foot note Bedau (1982) cites, “Actually being dead is no different from not being born, a (non) experience we all had before being born.  But death is not realized.  The process of dying which is a different matter is usually confused with it.  In turn, dying is feared because death is expected, even though death is feared because it is confused with dying (p. 338)”.

Death is an experience that cannot be experienced and ends all experience.  Because it is unknown as it is certain, death is universally feared.  “The life of a man should be sacred to each other (Bedau, H., 1982, p. 330)”.

Innocent Executed -no Proof

Opponents claim lots of innocent man are wrongly executed.  There has never been any proof of an innocent man being executed!!  A study  by Bedau-Radlet claimed there were 22 cases where the defendant have been wrongly executed.  However, this study is very controversial.  Studies like Markman and Cassell find that the methodology was flawed in l2 cases.  There was no substantial evidence of guilt, and no evidence of innocence.  Moreover, our judicial system takes extra precautions to be sure the innocent and their rights are protected.  Most likely an innocent person would not be executed (Internet).

Death Penalty Saves Lives

            The question is whether or not execution of an innocent person is strong enough to abolish the death penalty.  Remember, the death penalty saves lives.  Repeat murders are eliminated and foreseeable murders are deterred.  You must consider the victim as well as the defendant.

Hugo Bedau (1982) claims: 

The execution of the innocent believed guilty is a

miscarriage of justice that must be opposed whenever

detected.  But such miscarriage of justice do not

warrant abolition at the death penalty.  Unless the

 moral drawbacks of an activity practice, which include

 the possible death of innocent lives that might be saved

 by it, the activity is warranted.  Most human activities like

 medicine, manufacturing, automobile, and air traffic, sports,

 not to mention wars and revolutions, cause death of

 innocent bystanders.  Nevertheless, advantages outweigh

 the disadvantages, human activities including the penal

system with all its punishments are morally justified ( p. 323).

 

 

            Wesley Lowe states, “As for the penal system, accidentally executing an innocent person, I must point out that in this imperfect world, citizens are required to take certain risks in exchange for safety.”  He says we risk dying in an accident when we drive a car, and it is acceptable.  Therefore, risking that someone might be wrongfully executed is worth  saving thousand’s of innocent people who may be the next victim of murder (Internet).

Death Penalty-Right to Live

            Opponents say the State is like a murder himself.  The argument here is, if execution is murder, than killing someone in war is murder.  Our country should stop fighting wars.  On the contrary, is it  necessary to protect the rights of a group of people.  Hence, the death penalty is vital to protect a person’s right to live!  Is arresting someone same as kidnapping someone?  In the same, executing someone is not murder, it is punishment by society for a deserving criminal.

Bible Quotes

            Huggo A. Bedau (1982) states one popular objection to Capital punishment is that it gratifies the desire for revenge regarding as unworthy. The bible quotes the Lord declaring “Vengeance is mine” (Romans 12:19).  He thus legitimized vengeance and reserved it to Himself.  However, the Bible also enjoins, “The murderer shall surely be put

to death” (Numbers 35:16-18), recognizing that the death penalty can be warranted whatever the motive.  Religious tradition certainly suggest no less (p. 330).

            All religions believe having life is sacred.  If we deprive someone else life, he only suffers minor inconvenience;  hence, we cheapen human life—this is where we are at  today.

Death Penalty Deterrent Effect

            If we do not know whether the death penalty will deter others, we will be confronted with two uncertainties .  If we have the death penalty and achieve no deterrent effect, than, the life of convicted murderers has been expended in vain (from a deterrent point of view)—here is a net loss.  If we have the death sentence, and deter future murderers, we spared the lives of future victims-(the prospective murderers gain, too; they are spared punishment because they were deterred).  In this case, the death penalty is a gain, unless the convicted murderer is valued more highly than that of the unknown victim, or victims (Carrington, F., l978). 

Capital Punishment is not excessive, unnecessary punishment, for those who knowingly and intentionally commits  murder in  premeditation,  to take lives of others.  Even though  capital punishment is not used so often, it still is  a threat to the criminal.           

Justice

            Justice requires punishing the guilty even if only some can be punished and sparing the innocent, even if all are not spared.  Morally, justice must always be preferred to equality.  Justice cannot ever permit sparing some guilty person, or punishing some innocent ones, for the sake of equality—because others have been spared or punished.  In practice, penalties could never be applied if we insisted that they can be inflicted on only a guilty person unless we are able to make sure that they are equally applied to all other guilty persons.  Anyone familiar with the law enforcement knows that punishments can be inflicted only on an unavoidable “shudder” selection of the guilty  (Bedau, H., 1977).

Irwin Isenberg (1977) said,  when you kill a man with premeditation, you do something different than stealing from him.   “I favor the death penalty as a matter of justice and human dignity even apart from deterrence.  The penalty must be appropriate to the seriousness of the crime (p. 135).

Life is Sacred

In an interview with Professor van den Haag, a psychoanalyst and adjunct professor at New York University,  was questioned,    “Why  do you favor the death penalty?”  His answer was that the Federal prison had a man sentenced to Life who, since he has been in prison committed three more murders on three separate occasions .They were prison guards and inmates.  There’s no more punishment he can receive, therefore, in many cases, the death penalty is the only penalty that can deter.  He went on   saying “I hold life sacred, and because I hold it sacred, I feel that anyone who takes some one’s life should know that thereby he forsakes his own and does not just suffer an inconvenience about being put into prison for sometime (as cited in Isenberg, 1977, p. 135)

An Eye for an Eye

Some people argue that the capital punishment tends to brutalize and disregards society.  Do you agree?  Some people say the that penalty is legalized murder because it is like “an eye for an eye”.  The difference between punishment and the crime is that one is legalized and the other is not!  People are more brutalized by what they see on T.V. daily.  People are not brutalized by punishments  they are brutalized by our failure to serious punish,  the  brutal acts.

Could the same effect be achieved by putting the criminal in prison for life?  “Life in prison” means in six months the parole board can release the man to 12 years in some states.  “But even if it were real life imprisonment, it’s deterrent effect will never be as great as that of the death penalty.  The death penalty is the only actually irrevocable penalty.  Because of that, it is the one that people fear the most (Isenberg, I., 1977).

            The framers of the constitution clearly believed that Capital punishment was an acceptable mess of protecting society form “wicked dissolute men” Thomas Jefferson liked to talk about it (Carrington, F., 1978).

CONCLUSION

            My research on  issues on the death penalty  is one of the most debatable in the criminal justice system.  Today, there are many pros and cons to this death penalty issues.  However, if people weigh the arguments properly,  and have empathy for the victims, they will be more inclined to favor capital punishment.  As a matter of fact, most people in the U.S. today are in favor of it.  But we need more states to enforce the death penalty. 

            As you may have read in the arguments, the death penalty help to curtail future murderers, thus, we can save more lives.  The chances of murdering an innocent man  is very minute. 

My Opinion

            In my opinion, I am in favor of the death penalty, because we can save innocent lives.  Life to me is scared as Professor Haag stated.    My innocent nephew, Sean Burgado,  who was brutally murdered  by a shot gun to the chest, did not have a choice to make a last statement or  make a will before he died.    The people on death row can watch T.V. and enjoy their lives for another 20 years before they are executed.  They can prepare their death by making  a will and a last statement.   Sean’s  murder is still unsolved, and the killer is enjoying his life somewhere.  The murderer(s)  will probably  murder another person some day. 

            I heard on the news last month, February 2000, where a 62 year-old grandmother, Betty  Beets, was pleading for her life because she was on death row and was going to be executed.  At first, I felt very sorry for her, but after doing research on her, I learned she had five husbands.  She had already killed the fourth one, and served a prison sentence for murder, and she got out of prison early.  She murdered the  fifth husband-she shot him, and buried him in her back yard.  Betty Beets was imprisoned a second time, and now was pleading for her life?  It has been proven these killers do it again and again.  The rate of recidivism is high for people who commit murder and crimes.  I feel murderers should be executed the first time  because chances are they will come out of prison and kill another innocent person again.  We need stricter laws and swift death penalty.  

            I belong to a group called Parents of Murdered Children (POMC).  One of the woman came forward and told me how her husband shot and killed her five year-old daughter which she witnessed on her birthday.   He attempted to kill the two-year old son, too, but fortunately, the gun he was using didn’t go off a second time, because it was too old and the son’s life was sparred.   Her husband’s  intention was to kill the two children, and himself on her (the wife’s) birthday.  He said, if  I can’t have my children you won’t either.  Everything to her is still a  nightmare. 

            He (the husband) was sentenced to death, but committed suicide in prison.  She recently learned that prior to the killing he had contracted someone $5,000 to burn their house while she and the kids were inside. 

            She said she would have gone to see her husband being executed if he lived because she didn’t want him out again.  She said, “To me, I think for the most part, I didn’t care what happened to him.  I just didn’t want him to be out again after what he did.  I  told the District Attorney that I was afraid that he would get out and try to finish what he started” (Email, personal communication- March 31, 2000).

            There are too many stories like thesewhere people deserve the death penalty for killing other people.  If they are released from  prison, they will kill other innocent lives again. 

            I believe life is sacred, therefore, one who takes a life should have his own life taken away, too.  The Lord said in Exodus “Thou shalt not kill!”. It is one of the Ten Commandments.

 The laws today are too lenient.  If there is no death penalty in your  state, and a criminal  kills someone, it is because  he felt  he could  get out in 10 years or less from prison. There is no fear of death for him.   They see other murderers in the state get away with murder,  so they, too,  can get away with it.   They don’t have to fear the death penalty.   In fact, I read where a husband intentionally moved to a non death penalty state, so he could murder his wife and get away with it.  Many murders are premeditated.   People in the “heat of passion” should make it a  point to evade the argument or the environment.  Remember it could be one of your loved ones.  Can you imagine what it would be like to have your loved one murdered?  There are no words that can explain the loss of your loved one to murder.  Call your state legislature representatives  today to enforce the death penalty in your state!

 Lori Ornellas                                                                                      

 

 

Abstract

            The purpose of this paper is to look at both sides of the arguments of the death penalty-the pros and cons, and how our criminal justice system makes legislatures, courts, and the U.S. Supreme Court chose to resolve issues.  Interesting issues are brought up like the fear of the death penalty, bible quotes, how life is sacred, and the execution of the innocent. You will note too much emphasis is placed on the convicted murderer and not on the victim.  The murderers get out of prison early and murder again.  There are evidence to both sides of the argument in whether the death penalty is a deterrent or not.  In question of the death penalty, I ask you  to weigh both sides of the argument carefully and make your decision based on the action that will serve the best humanitarian purpose of criminal law. 

Page visited     times since 5/3/01

0 thoughts on “Pros For Death Penalty Essay”

    -->

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *